{"id":384,"date":"2008-08-05T14:48:22","date_gmt":"2008-08-05T18:48:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/archives\/384"},"modified":"2008-08-05T14:48:22","modified_gmt":"2008-08-05T18:48:22","slug":"zoos-and-flies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/archives\/384","title":{"rendered":"Zoos and Flies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A recent <a href=\"http:\/\/bldgblog.blogspot.com\/2008\/07\/zoology.html\">post<\/a> on the always excellent <a href=\"http:\/\/bldgblog.blogspot.com\/\">BLDGBLOG<\/a> got me doing a little thinking. First, a long quote from the <a href=\"http:\/\/bldgblog.blogspot.com\/2008\/07\/zoology.html\">post<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I have to register my fascination again, however, with the idea that zoos actually represent a kind of spatial hieroglyphics through which humans communicate \u2013 or, more accurately, <em>mis<\/em>communicate \u001f\u2013 with other species.<br \/>\nThat is, zoos are decoy environments that refer to absent landscapes elsewhere. If this act of reference is read, or interpreted correctly, by the non-human species for whom the landscape has been constructed, then you have a successful zoo. One could perhaps even argue here that there is a grammar \u2013 even a <em>deep<a href=\"http:\/\/deep-structure.blogspot.com\/\" target=\"_blank\"> <\/a>structure<\/em> \u2013 to the landscape architecture of zoos.<br \/>\nZoos, in this way of thinking, are at least partially subject to a rhetorical analysis: do they express what they are intended to communicate \u2013 and how has this meaning been produced?<br \/>\nLandscape architecture becomes an act not just of stylized geography, or aesthetically shaped terrain, but of communication across species lines.Of course, this can also be inverted: are these landscapes really meant to be read, understood, and interpreted by what we broadly refer to as &#8220;animals,&#8221; or are these landscapes simply projections of our own inner fantasies of the wild? Or should I say The Wild?<br \/>\nWhile this latter scenario sounds much more likely to be the case \u2013 humans, like a broken cinema, always live inside their own projections \u2013 nonetheless, the non-human communicational possibilities of landscape architecture will continue to fascinate me.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Three observations &#8211; general, personal and tangential.<\/p>\n<p><em>General.<\/em> In the post-wunderkammer\/boxes with iron bars era, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aza.org\/index.html\">zoos<\/a> have tended to define their mission as a mix of conservation (breeding) and education (exhibits). The 2 pieces sometimes don&#8217;t align well; often species needing conservation may not be charismatic (lots of LBJs &#8211; little brown jobs &#8211; need help). Further &#8211; when trying to educate the public there&#8217;s the animal itself, its behavior (especially in groups) and its habitat. If you want to tie education back to conservation, informing people about the biome is critical &#8211; to paraphrase the real estate saw, it&#8217;s habitat, habitat, habitat. An accurate, naturalistic setting may not be what you want, though, if breeding is your goal. Keeping track of rations, who&#8217;s doing what to who, and controlling environmental parameters (I&#8217;m thinking of herps that need to be put in a rain chamber to kick off breeding, for example) may be facilitated by a less complicated &#8211; though still far from a white plastic box &#8211; enclosure. Two audiences for the landscape architect&#8217;s communication &#8211; the viewing public and the animals inhabiting the landscape. Two measures of success &#8211; does the public come away with a better understanding of how\/where the animal lives (and pressures on same) and does the animal display the same range of behaviors it would in it&#8217;s home range and does it breed? It&#8217;s my impression that zoos deal with this tension by doing a lot of the breeding work off-stage where they can manipulate stimuli without having to worry about a bunch of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_naked_ape\">follicly challenged primates<\/a> tapping on the glass.<\/p>\n<p><em>Personal.<\/em> I keep and breed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dendrobates.org\/index.html\">poison dart frogs<\/a>. There are many reasons I enjoy them &#8211; behavior (parental care, especially), physical beauty, size (manageable); one ties in to this post &#8211; the opportunity to do some world-building. Dendrobatids and naturalistic vivaria go together like, I dunno, lobster and butter. You don&#8217;t need a planted tank to be successful with darts &#8211; lots of leaf litter, some film cannisters or a petri dish &#8211; depending on the species&#8217; egg deposition preference &#8211; and a mister bottle will usually do the trick. It&#8217;s almost the reverse case &#8211; you can put PDFs in a planted tank and rather than destroying the plants and trashing the joint, they will settle in and, if you&#8217;ve done your world building well, thrive. To circle back to Geoff&#8217;s communication point again &#8211; I guess I&#8217;m trying to communicate with the frogs in an unnecessarily complicated way, with the complexity being for my &#8211; the observer&#8217;s &#8211; benefit.<\/p>\n<p><em>Tangential.<\/em> I&#8217;m reminded of one of the lines of polarity in fly (as in fly fishing) design: impressionistic vs. realistic. At the extreme, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.grahamowengallery.com\/fishing\/more-fly-tying.html\">realistic flies<\/a> don&#8217;t serve an aquatic audience at all\u00a0 &#8211; they exist solely for the human observer. At the other end of the scale, impressionistic flies are all about trying to guess what attributes stimulate a take. Shape, size, material, etc, are all chosen as a best guess at what makes a hatching caddis look like food to a fish. It&#8217;s about listening to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FWhat-Trout-Said-Datus-Proper%2Fdp%2F1558210148%2F&amp;tag=hawkdog-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325\">what the trout said<\/a><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=hawkdog-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1\" style=\"border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important\" width=\"1\" border=\"0\" height=\"1\" \/>. An anecdote (OK, it&#8217;s a damn fish story) &#8211; I was out at dawn once right around the June full moon fishing for stripers. There were fish all around me, but I couldn&#8217;t buy a strike. After flailing the water for a while I decided to stop and watch for a bit &#8211; I quickly realized that the bass were eating small seaworms that were swimming around near the surface of the water. I went through my fly box and cut the tail off the smallest, sparsest <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stripersurf.com\/FG_deceiver.html\">Deceiver<\/a> I had, making it even shorter and wispier. I cast the fly out and let it drift with the current,\u00a0 twitching it occasionally. I hooked a fish almost immediately. I guess the first step in communication with another critter is listening&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/home.att.net\/~jack.castro\/Fly-library\/Northwest-Fly-Page.htm\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/home.att.net\/~jack.castro\/images\/flies\/grn-caddis-pup.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent post on the always excellent BLDGBLOG got me doing a little thinking. First, a long quote from the post: I have to register my fascination again, however, with the idea that zoos actually represent a kind of spatial &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/archives\/384\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[6,14,24,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-384","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-creatures","category-making-things","category-type2","category-wunderkammer"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pdqxx-6c","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=384"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=384"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/hawkdog.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}